Many forms of dream
groups are ones which do not listen attentively to dreams but using them only
as stepping stones to broader psychological, philosophical or religious
reflections. Dreams become displaced by group members' opinions not originating
from dreams but from our daily waking life. This means replacing the most
influential elements with less important ones.
There are innumerable orientations, which
have rigid basic assumptions (be it scientific, religious, based on diverse psychotherapy schools etc.) about the meaning of dreams. I call them confessional. The more strictly one has
adopted some interpretative theoretical system, the less one is able to see
anything which is not concordant with his theory. One type of groups blindfolded
with their theory can be found in religious and occult circles, where dreams are seen as
expressions of higher wisdom, as conscious, autonomous entities, belonging to
the realms of guardian angels and spiritual teachers. Typical for this kind of idealized
approach is a strong need for dependency, need to become subjugated by some
higher authority. The majority of dream literature reflects this viewpoint.
There are ways to work with dreams,
which are not to such an extent ideologically limited that they would always twist dreams into
a standard predefined pattern. Nonetheless, many of them limit the dream process in
some other ways. They may predefine the process by being too restrictive in
advance, for example by having rules which define which parts of the dream the
dreamer is allowed to choose, for example only the three most impressive
subjects or the three most obscure subjects in the dream, which are then used
as starting points for subsequent work. A dream is thus chopped and chained up
and tied to a leash of a predefined format.
No comments:
Post a Comment